After opening a second warehouse, management needed a model that connected utilisation, headcount, and capex to cash — not only P&L.
Problem
Legacy spreadsheets could not flex capacity scenarios; board debates stalled on conflicting versions.
Approach
We designed a driver-based model with utilisation bands, wage and contractor logic, and explicit capex timing. Training sessions covered updates and version control.
Outcome
Board approvals for hiring and equipment proceeded with shared assumptions. Cash warnings appeared two quarters earlier than prior tools had shown.
Outcome
Management gained clearer visibility for board and banking discussions, with models and reporting rhythms the internal team could maintain after handover.
Related work
Representative engagements illustrating how we deliver similar outcomes.
Frequently asked questions
Why rebuild after warehouse expansion?
Legacy spreadsheets could not flex utilisation and capex scenarios for board decisions.
Was training included?
Yes — sessions on updates, drivers, and version control for the internal team.